Manufacturer: Yashica
Model: 635
Film: 120 or 35mm
Type: twin-lens reflex (TLR)
Lens: 80mm f/3.5 Yashikor lens, aperture range f/3.5 to f/22. Minimum focus distance is 1 m / 3.3 ft. Bay-1 filter mount.
Shutter speed: 1 s – 1/500 s, and “Bulb”. Copal MXV leaf shutter. Shutter is cocked with a lever on the front. Shutter release is on the bottom left of the front of the camera.
Features:
Included conversion kit for 35mm film, shot in portrait orientation.
For medium format, there is a film counter that is automatically reset when loading film
For 35mm format, there is a manually-set film counter
“Cold shoe” accessory attachment
PC flash sync
Self-timer
Double exposures possible, as shutter may be fired without film being wound first.
My father-in-law was given this camera and he plans to sell it on ebay. Knowing my obsession, he asked if I wanted to borrow it first. So I took it for a test drive. I already have a Yashicamat which I like a lot; it has a nicer lens than the 635, but doesn’t also shoot 35mm. I decided to try the 35mm option, since that was new to me.
It probably made more sense back when the camera was made, but shooting 35mm in this camera has some distinct disadvantages. First off, you’re forced to shoot portrait orientation as the film runs vertically through the camera. And unlike a regular 35mm camera, turning this camera on its side to shoot landscape orientation is extremely difficult. Also, composing and focusing with the 35mm crop lines in the viewfinder takes some getting used to. I found myself with my eye up to the pop-up magnifying glass constantly, to make sure I was getting acceptable focus. Swapping out the 35mm kit takes a few minutes, and of course you can’t swap it out mid-roll if you decide you want to switch formats. I’d rather just carry two cameras, but back in the 60s if you only owned one camera, this made a lot more sense.
80mm is a slightly wide lens for medium format. When you use it for 35mm however, it is a mild telephoto lens. Which theoretically is ideal for portraits at that focal length actually. I didn’t get a chance to try the camera with medium format film, but the experience was very similar to my Yashicamat. Would I go out of my way to find a 635? No. I don’t think the 35mm option is worth the trouble. Better to get a dedicated 120 format camera with a better lens in my opinion. But if you’re set on this for the novelty of the camera, it seems to handle pretty well.
Below, what the insides look like without the 35mm kit installed.
And below, the camera with the 35mm kit installed.
You’re playing my song.
and a P.S.
I enjoy the lens on the 635. But you do have to think of it almost as an effect. Below f8, it starts to get soft. The 4-element lenses found on the later Yashica TLRs were definitely sharper below f8. Above f8, there is almost no noticeable difference between the two. There are times that I find the softening effect at f3.5 to be very pleasing. It kind of depends on the look you’re after.
I don’t recall what I was shooting at, but I’m pretty sure I was stopped down quite a bit since it was daylight conditions. Never got to test the soft/wide-open apertures. But really I can’t be bothered.
I’ve got enough cameras that need love, without spending too much time on one that’s on the ebay chopping block! I do like the way my Yashicamat handles big apertures though. Will do a camera profile on that one down the road. In the mean time, here’s a self portrait I did in a hotel bathroom. Probably f/4 and shutter speed of 1/8 or so, don’t recall exactly. Got lucky with the focus.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/shampoo_cam/4836692198/
The self portrait is great.
The 635 can be a bit contrasty in bright daylight. I always shoot 120 in mine and I usually use b&w film. I think of it as a graphic thing, but I have gotten some very nice shots with it. Next medium format on my list will be a Pentax 645. For now, when I want crisp, sharp and perfect in film, I go to my Nikon F3. Never lets me down. No surprises.
These pictures brings back such a nostalgic feel of the Yashica days
I owned one(not the kind in the pic though) – still do and love it…
What I love about the shots is that you capture the reality of the picture. I can see all blemishes, freckles and rosey cheeks.
Great detail!
Much cleaner than the Yashica C I got for my wife!
Unless it’s for landscape, I prefer to shoot mostly wide open and don’t mind the softness; with the same 80mm F3.5 Yashikor:
http://www.appealtoemulsion.com/2010/06/twin-lens-revival.html
and
http://www.appealtoemulsion.com/2010/06/yashica-c-x2.html
and
http://www.appealtoemulsion.com/2010/06/yashica-c-in-color.html
Pictures are beautiful, very ditailed. Great job!
wow nice images ,i like it.
Thanks for the great images.. keep up the good work!
Lovely shots.. Great stuff!
Pingback: Yashica Pentamatic guide Reviews | Yashica Camera Review
Such a classic type of Camera. But it’s nice, the image quality is very realistic and I did not even expect that Yashica could be like this great. Anyway thanks for your images. It’s a nice piece of art.
Pingback: YASHICA 35MM GUIDE: HOW TO USE THE YASHICA 35J,YASHICA MINISTER AND YASHICA LYNX (CAMERA GUIDES) | Yashica Camera Review
Pingback: The Yashica Guide | Yashica Camera Review
Such grate post,You given me information of Yashica camera.